PageRank and Backlink Update at Google
April 7, 2009
PageRank and Backlink Update at Google and what came of it and who did well as a result with guest Disa Johnson. They also discuss links and bad neighborhoods.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Related Episodes
Comments
11 Responses to “PageRank and Backlink Update at Google”
Leave a Reply
Support Programming
|
|
This was a fitting show to announce AirDisa
It seems that they are updating this oolbar a lot more frequently than they used to don’t you think?
This latest one has left us seeing many sites with higher internal pr pages than thier home page, is this something others have noticed?
It seems like I see pr changes pretty frequently, along with with the “quarterly” big ones, like this last one.
I don’t think I am hallucinating.
thanks!You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.
Thanks though, i’m glad some people share good stuff like this! It will greatly help me in my SEO activities.
Hi all,
I think that there are many reasons to be skeptical about it. They have a huge amount of data (assume they do have a massive index) and the same method of providing results. If anything the results run the risk of being worse.
There have been tests done by Google and the National Center for Supercomputer Applications which seem to show that the index is not that big at all.
Large indexes go stale pretty quick. Have a look at the crawls on your site maybe, are they harder and faster?
I wrote a lot more on this at your trusty Search Science blog .
Hope you find it interesting. Let’s see what happens to this scenario.
Reply With Quote
xan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to xan
Visit xan’s homepage!
Find all posts by xan
#20
Old 08-16-2005
PerformanceSEO PerformanceSEO is offline
“Be Accountable”
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 78
PerformanceSEO will become famous soon enoughPerformanceSEO will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannysullivan
Surely yes, a shoot out and regulary relevancy reporting according to an agreed industry standard would be much better. Size is just the same old thing, a figure used as a surrogate for relevancy but which doesn’t mean the same thing at all.
I fully agree with Danny. There should be an independent 3rd party routine testing of relevancy on a semi-annual or quarterly basis. Perhaps the IAB or the W3C? This would really help the public understand which search engine is “bigger and/or better”.
a walk-through of the results which turned out to be completely off-topic.
Hey there nice post and nice blog you have here! Come check me out at http://www.backlinkplus.com/ – it is an amazing site and if you contact me soon enough i will give you a special deal!
Page rank is definately and interesting subject. Im always on the watch of the green when the update comes around.
And yes, anything getting more people to crochet is good, but really, what do you DO with them. ,
I like your style, the fact that your site is a little bit different makes it so interesting, I get fed up of seeing same-old-same-old all of the time. I’ve just stumbled this page for you
This has been really interesting, thanks for that. I love this blog theme too!
you’ve got a great blog. Keep up the excellent work. I’ve bookmarked your site already and told some close friends to check it out. Talk to you later!